Back to qsonet.com QsoNet Discussions

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist     
 ProfileProfile     Log inLog in 

CQ100 for the Iphone

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    QsoNet Discussions Forum Index -> FAQ
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
N3SOH



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 1
Location: Lutherville, maryland

PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 10:28 pm    Post subject: CQ100 for the Iphone Reply with quote

It would be nice to have at least one band for the Iphone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
K5ZFG



Joined: 19 Nov 2010
Posts: 1
Location: Frankston, Texas 75763

PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2011 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree!! I'd love to see an application for the iPhone. You got my vote
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VU2RBI



Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 1
Location: new delhi

PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2012 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hello iam bharathi I do have iphone how to use cq100 inIphone
vu2rbi bharathi from delhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NJ3H



Joined: 15 Oct 2009
Posts: 57
Location: Stephens City, Virginia, USA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am sure that many folks that shell out $39 a year desire that an android or iphone app could be made available.

Or even some of the excellent suggestions for improvement to the CQ100/QSO-TV system be implemented. However, it appears that nothing new is happening. Usage is down, at least when I check many times during the day and night, there just might be the CW beacon blip only. There are the regulars that one always hear, but very few new people. The software does a wonderful job in allowing users to communicate over the internet. So why is the CQ100 system used so little?

One has to start wondering if it is worth the renewal fee. I know of four folks who have dropped out (not renewing) due to inactivity on CQ100 and I am sure there must be many more. I hear discussions that low usage can be attributed to the fact that HF is open. I can assure you that without a super station, this pathetic solar cycle is making communication difficult at best. There are even forecasts that toward the end of 2013, the cycle will be in decline. Will this bring people back to CQ100? I have no crystal ball.

It is a shame to see a VoIP system as fine as CQ100 just sit there with so few spikes during any 24 hour period. I cannot imagine that there are many paid members. At what point will the cost of managing and hosting this system become more than the paid subscriber's annual payment? Is it me or is there just a total apathy surrounding all things CQ100?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VE6ER



Joined: 29 Oct 2006
Posts: 19
Location: Edmonton AB

PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 5:37 pm    Post subject: 100 Reply with quote

I suspect the apathy is that too many are listening and no one calling. How often on HF have you (and I mean all hams) called CQ with no result. What do you do? Call again and again. That does not appear to happen on CQ100. Perhaps that is the result of the "Calling frequency". Everone is waiting for "the" call.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
N4LBW



Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Posts: 2
Location: Spruce Pine, NC

PostPosted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:59 am    Post subject: IPAD Reply with quote

Is there any plan to do an app for IPAD? I got a IPAD, and I would like to use it with CQ 100. Hamsphere now has an app. I like CQ 100 better than Hamsphere, but may consider getting Hamsphere if CQ 100 does not get an app for I phone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    QsoNet Discussions Forum Index -> FAQ All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group